Are we Americans dumb?
started by Nisha007 4 mnths agoReplies
you slackjaws should elect monika or that other bignose whitetrash from arkansas. those two had billyboy inside them more often than hilary did fo sho.
I hope you can't vote. Imagine that? I had to reapply for my voting rights and people as dumb as you are allowed to vote.
Hillary is failing as a candidate, not as woman.
Before you blame all the Americans & their dislike for woman president...dont forget it was Hillary who initially campaigned as beeing a woman...she event used her fake tears to win over the women. Frankly... all political rivals ..whether it was democrats or republicans did treat her like a Man.
I am SO sick of the whole "first woman" and "first black" !! who gives a **!? We're looking at people who are qualified for a position! I think it's more sexist and racist to even acknowledge this.
I work for a corporation that has women and blacks in senior leadership roles. It doesn't make a difference - they still have to do their jobs.
The whole media shapes this country. It's ridiculous.
*end of rant*
(expect more by Nov)
LOL. Amidst all the Hindi abuse today, I missed a gem. Do you mind if I sent it in to the DNRC newsletter? Thanks.
ok... well here is an example..
Just take a look at our own Rev. Joe - the Cage Master..and you will know the answer.....:)
In any case - it will be McCain the president and PERHAPS, Jindal the VP.
Actually I have been saying this (and believe me top notch intellectuals in India too) have been saying that Obama is clearly a republican ploy to destabilize Clinton and facilitate McCain's victory. I am sure what you said will happen given the state of affairs. While politically Republicans will end up being very astute, what irks me is how stupid could the people get. I wont say that for the media because obviously they are paid to demoralize Clinton fromt he beginning. Which brings us to the point that media seems like an outsider in all countries, US is no exception. They just bark when paid. Period.
He is a known devil.
He is an experienced devil
he has not changed sides or sidetracked like the two Dems (or demons).
He is NOT Bush, Jr.
He is more like Bush, Sr... socially liberal and economically conservative and a real war veteran. So even if he appears like a war monger he will be more objective and decisive than Bush, Jr, or the dems. No one can say for sure what the two dems will do once they become a pres..
He is a WHITE and a MALE - two things that go against the two dems in this sexist and racist country.
With the "freak" Jindal by his side he might even rope in the Church wallahs to his side and deflect the destrators.
White House does not have to worry about IT problem in the white house as our Geek desi Jindal can take care of it.....
In short he will be more 0.3*Reagan + 0.5* Bush, Sr + 0.2* Clinton.
Down side.... He may continue the "mortgage the future" economic policy of the Reps.
He might end up getting more involved in Iraq AND Iran.
He will be a stepping stone for the Geek Freak Jindal.
P.S. BTW, Jindal is a Punjabi speaking, North Indian - Oh no....;)
This Indian-American woman was a loyal supporter of the Clintons
*I was deeply disappointed and changed my mind when Mrs. Clinton was among the first to vote for Iraq war and knew I could not support her...she has never apologized her vote- and for all the unnecessary thousands of deaths and bloodshed.
*I was also again disappointed to see the way the Clintons..don't "play by the rules" and will do whatever to win.
*I was a little conflicted at times..but, her recent statement about "obliterating Iran"..pretty much did it...I could never support anyone (in any country- who has such a mentality to obliterating any country).
M
People just dont use any judicious discretion. They are weak in spirit and mind and it is easy to manipulate their analysis and judgement. Media has been against Clinton from day 0. A consistent paid propaganda of all her assumed wrongs has clearly worked on people like the one you just quoted.
When US was attacked and more than 3000 people died, when Taliban assumed responsibility, who in their patriotic minds would oppose a war against Iraq when capturing Osama became a distant or a difficult alternative? What was wrong with that initial concession?
As to "dont play by rules" ho ho ho.... who does anyways? Are Republicans playing by the rules? Is Obama playing by the rules?
The clear give away that Obama is a Repulican ploy is his name. Only they can act so stupidly vengeant. Like in one of their Mogambo like "strategic" meets someone must have come up with a question, "what should we name the guy who will save us from Osama? And pat came Mogambo's reply "Obama!!!
The "Obama"/"Osama" thing is so old and has been overplayed.
I am optimistic...and look forward to an interesting general election...
For now- I have some faith in my fellow-Americans...(at least a majority of them)...
*I have not heard an American leader say "I will not only meet with friends but with enemies".. Obama's courage, integrity and the way he has been dignified (to me) has impressed me..
But, I will be watching Barack closely....so far he has played by the rules *(imo)...if he does not, I can always change my mind..
I going to give him a chance as I did with the Clintons(many, many, many times)...even during the impeachment trial, all the scandals (thought that was their personal lives)..
The war/fear mongering- does not work for me.
M
he will have supernatural power