US- Super Tuesday

started by Maria S 7 mnths ago

I am so excited...I can hardly wait for the results of the Super Tuesday Presidential primaries (tomorrow night).

Of course- no one knows who is going to win..and will have to accept it:)
I have never seen younger voters so excited and energized! 

In my very, very biased view...all the Marias I have known are fabulous women- and this Maria S is no exception:)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62_ajoKkuHA

M

Reply



Flat Nested

Replies


  Sablu posted Re:US- Super Tuesday on 7 mnths ago
Dear Sivaram Ji,

                             It is very nice to read your post on US- Super Tuesday. Unfortunately I could not see the link youtube sent by you due to technical problems in PC. Thanks for sharing the post.

Regards,
Sablu Mukesh

  sivaram56 posted Re:US- Super Tuesday on 7 mnths ago
I hope Obama wins either California   or New Jersey which is Clinton,s strongest base.
What Obama lacks is Latinos votes .Kennedys endorsement plus the leading Spanish daily endorsement must have tilted the scale plus endorsement by LA Times.
Young voters are going to be behind Obama but women votes will be with Hillary .Let us wait and see
Sivaram
  Maria S posted Re:US- Super Tuesday on 7 mnths ago


If Obama wins the popular vote/or delegates in California...that would be an enormous boost.

*Looks like a million people in California have already cast their absentee ballots a few weeks ago (most of those votes would be for Hillary...before the current momentum)..

Overall, it is exciting and intriguing!

M
  Uppili posted Re:(US) Super Tuesday on 7 mnths ago
Isn't this SUPER business ruining the slow and stead process of electing a candidate and instead selects someonw in a rush ?

Remember the days when Iowa held its FIRST caucus in February - that is the real elections started only at this time ? Now we are looking at the possibility of the primaries defacto ending today.

Each state trying to be as influential as possible has joined this super bandwagon only to kill the effectiveness of the process.  California which held its primaries in June was an empty exercise for decades now and now has joined th e bandwagon, making the other states much less influential - ironically.

 - in my view.

  Uppili posted Re:US- Super Tuesday on 7 mnths ago
Looks like it will be another 4 years for the republicans (at least).

It will be McCain who wins the presidential election.  The dems dont have a WINNING candidate.
  Amerasian posted Re:US- Super Tuesday on 7 mnths ago
"Looks like it will be another 4 years for the republicans (at least).
It will be McCain who wins the presidential election.  The dems dont have a WINNING candidate."

I agree! Hillary is not popular all over the country. People see her as an ultra-liberal. And Obama is not that much different from her. Obama is popular, but is he popular enough to win the presidential election? 

McCain  is considered to be a moderate republican. The fact that he is a former marine and POW(Vietnam) will help him immensely.




  vish shanker posted Re:US- Super Tuesday on 7 mnths ago
I second that about the fabulous Maria S s

  Amerasian posted Re:US- Super Tuesday on 7 mnths ago
"Of course- no one knows who is going to win..and will have to accept it:)
I have never seen younger voters so excited and energized! "


Looks like McCain will be the Republican nominee barring a miracle for Mitt Romney.
Do you think either Obama or Hillary have the potential to beat McCain in the presidential race? 
Watch this: http://www.johnmccain.com/pathtovictory/democrats.htm?s=google&t=electability
Of course, it's too early to predict, and a lot of changes could take place between now and November. Regardless of the outcome, it's going to be very interesting. If Clinton wins, it would be the first time a former 'First Lady' to be one of the contestants in the presidential race. Obama's win will be historial too for obvious reasons.
  Maria S posted Re:US- Super Tuesday on 7 mnths ago
"Do you think either Obama or Hillary have the potential to beat McCain in the presidential race?"

_______

Sure! Nothing is impossible:)

*McCain-is/will be a strong Rebublican candidate...but, the Republican base (conservatives, evangelicals...etc) people like Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter etc..will never vote for him...some may hold their nose and vote...but, this is such a fascinating election....so many may cross over from one party to another....if I am not happy with the "tone" of the  Democratic- course of Democratic canditates (and if what happened in South Carolina- happens again)..I would vote for a Republican- for the first time...I am sure many Republicans (I know) are going to vote in the Democratic primaries tomorrow!

It is fascinating..

M


  Jauhari posted Re:US- Super Tuesday on 7 mnths ago
I hate to disagree with you but McCain couldn't win if he was running unopposed.  McCain is the sacrificial lamb that the republicans have put up so Hillary could win.  That's correct!  You obviously have alot to learn about American politics.  The Tri-lateral commission says who will win and who won't.  Hillary Clinton was selected to win for president this time around.  And Hillary will win!  Nobody would ever vote for a 72 year old man to be the president of the U.S.A.  And the tri-lateral commission knows it.  That is why he is selected to run against Hillary.  McCain will be 76 after a 4 year term.  McCain is NOT electable.   Hillary has been selected to be our next president.  There was a book put out last year by a republican that already named Hillary Clinton as our next president.  The book isn't even out on the markets yet.  American politics are very nasty when you dig into the process.

  jaijui posted Re:US- Super Tuesday on 7 mnths ago

no Maria , 
two types of minorities in democratic party ..  people here are not ready  for them

 i  think it'll be a Republican candidacy  ..Mccain ,Huckabee  ticket

  Jauhari posted Re:US- Super Tuesday on 7 mnths ago

George Bush was a member of the Council On Foreign Relations in the 1970's, when he served in a succession of appointed positions under President Nixon and President Ford. He was director of the Central Intelligence Agency; Chairman of the Republican National Committee; head of the Liaison Office in the Peoples Republic of China; and U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations. Bush remained in the Council even after leaving public office. He ended his membership during his campaign for the Republican nomination for President in 1980, when his CFR connection started to become an issue among conservatives.

George Bush was among the founding members of the Tri-lateral Commission, retaining his connections even while officially "on leave of absence in government service."

Bill Clinton is a late-comer to both organizations, being invited to join only in the past couple of years. Nonetheless, he is the third member of the Trilateral Commission to be elected President since the Commission was founded in 1973.

George Bush and Bill Clinton are not alone among high public officials in their CFR/Trilateral connections. Outgoing Secretary of State James Baker is a long-time member of the Council On Foreign Relations, as is Acting Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger. Secretary Baker's predecessors at the State Department have included George Shultz and Cyrus Vance, members of the Council On Foreign Relations; and Alexander Haig as well as Henry Kissinger, both CFR members and founding members of the Trilateral Commission. Clinton's Secretary of State is Warren Christopher, Vice-Chairman of the Council On Foreign Relations, and a long-time member of the Trilateral Commission.

Harold Brown and Caspar Weinberger, Secretaries of Defense under President Carter and President Reagan, respectively, are both CFR members and again, founding members of the Trilateral Commission. Outgoing Defense Secretary Richard Cheney is a CFR member, as is the new Defense Secretary, Les Aspin.

Other founding members of the Trilateral Commission include Paul Volcker, former head of the Federal Reserve System, and Alan Greenspan, current Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. Both are also CFR members.

We don't have the space to list the literally hundreds of additional CFR members and dozens of Trilateralists who have held policy positions in just the recent administrations. Such a record would be impressive for any organization, let alone a Council with only 2500 members, and a Commission with fewer than 100 members from the United States.

By contrast, the National Taxpayers Union has over 200,000 members nation-wide, including Republicans, Democrats and Independents. Yet since its founding in 1971, it has not had a single member appointed to the Cabinet. Perhaps this would change if the National Taxpayers Union were to give up its commitment to lower taxes and less government.

President-elect Clinton in late December announced his choices for the Cabinet and other top administration positions. Senator Lloyd Bentsen, his choice for Secretary of the Treasury, as well as Bruce Babbit, Interior Secretary nominee, are members of both the Trilateral Commission and the Council On Foreign Relations. Other CFR members headed for positions in the new administration include Anthony Lake, named as National Security Advisor; Andrea Tyson, who will head the Council of Economic Advisors. Clinton has announced that he will appoint CFR member Madeleine Albright as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, and and that he will make the U.N. Ambassador a full member of the Cabinet.


  Maria S posted Re:US- Super Tuesday on 7 mnths ago

Jaijui....you may be right....but, I shall stick with the "audacity of hope"- that things can be different (for now at least!)

 
Amerasian,
*They were just examples...I kind of know- what is going on with the "mainstream republicans" too...but, so many things about this election is unpredictable!

Vish,
Thanks, I am sure you are very objective and very smart man:-))

M

  vish shanker posted Re:US- Super Tuesday on 7 mnths ago
Not smart enough to outsmart you or win you Maria :)
I

  Jauhari posted Re:US- Super Tuesday on 7 mnths ago
Please allow me to give you just a little bit of information.

PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES WHO ARE MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS:

  • FRED THOMPSON,CFR
  • HILLARY CLINTON, CFR
  • AL GORE, Trilateral Commission
  • JOHN MCCAIN, CFR
  • BARRACK OBAMA, CFR
  • MIT ROMNEY, CFR

Former Presidents who were members of the CFR before and during their terms in office:

  • GEORGE W. BUSH, Trilateral Commission
  • BILL CLINTON, CFR and Trilateral Commission
  • GEORGE H.W. BUSH Sr., Council on Foreign Relations director from 1977-1979, and a member of the Trilateral Commission
     
Notice Ron Paul is not a member of the CFR or the Trilateral commission?  Where is he?  Ron Paul was the only one that was telling the truth but he's OUT!  Why?



  Amerasian posted Re:US- Super Tuesday on 7 mnths ago
"McCain-is/will be a strong Rebublican candidate...but, the Republican base (conservatives, evangelicals...etc) people like Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter etc..will never vote for him...some may hold their nose and vote...but, this is such a fascinating election....so many may cross over from one party to another...."

Limbaugh and Coulter do not represent the 'mainstream' republicans. Virginia has been known as a strong Republican state, but they have elected a Dem. Governor the last two times. It shows there is a large group of  indepent-minded voted. The key to winning the presidential race for either Dem. or Rep. nominee would be winning the minds and hearts of the independents, and moderate dems. & republicans.




© 1998-2008 Copyright Sulekha.com Connecting Indians Worldwide, All Rights Reserved.

Embed Videos

TipTip: To embed video from YouTube or others, copy the embed URL given and click insert button.

Title:             

Embed script:

Insert