Although dalitism is a charming concept and the institution there in sounds very logical and ethical.I am against it.I feel that Babasaheb ambedkar created dalits amongst the dalits and further divided the India society.

Although his concepts\writings of non communist equaliterian societies are attractive but they lack very basic things such as the most required.."historical facts".

Dalits say that they were dominated and weren't not allowed equal appourtunity..
hello..i say to themmm before you make more ridiculous statements like these..why not dwell in to the history of india..and know more..

When they blaim hindus or hinduism for dominating themm I ask them a single question..

Islam was dominating india for more than 1000 years..why did they not converted to Islam..Islam promises equality at no cost..then why not? I think this entire concept of dalitism is just another propoganda to empower the less privelaged..and nothing else.
Babasaheb Ambedkar wasted energy in writing and establishing the dalit moment..

what a joke..from the angle i view it..it seems so foolish..i mean he must have been  weak in history when he blaimed hinduism for all the bad things which happened to the so called dalits..

can any one argue with me based on or by enlisting historical facts..that why the so called dalits did not convert to Islam and sustained the hindu hegemony?
any sane arguments???