Isn't this blatantly against the Secularism that we seek to cherish? -- rawemotions.
"seek to cherish?"
the advertisement and the employer are indeed discriminating among people on the basis of religion. however, the employer is saudi or some other kind of arab. they apparently have no obligation to be secular. your complaint is futile. the only complaint that has any possibility of having some effect might be one made to the newspaper. you may be able to persuade the newspaper publisher to not accept any such ads, although i find that unlikely, for they want as much advertising revenue as possible.
you could try to have some law enacted in india that would make such advertisements illegal. if such a law is enacted, only indians will suffer. the arabs will merely minimize recruitment from india, and hire more people from indonesia, pakistan, and bangladesh. if you think that only indian muslims will suffer, you'd be wrong; deprived of opportunities in the middle east, indian muslims will compete harder for the limited number of jobs in india;
moreover, remittances from abroad will decrease, and both consumption and investment spending in india by indians employed abroad will decrease. this will, in turn, reduce demand, output, employment, and the standard of living - of everyone, not only the muslims - in india.
don't you see that the arabs are depriving themselves of the best talents available in india by restricting the pool from which they select their employees to muslims? are you that concerned about arab welfare that you want to correct them?
the notion of india retaliating against others' idiotic actions - of e.g., the arab countries, pakistan, and b'desh - in the same idiotic way has long been touted at sulekha. read gyanputra's, uppili's, sandilya's, and little fella's posts. no matter how much satisfaction it brings you, we would not be acting in our own best interest, including that of our non-muslims, by retaliating.
flimflam
Raw,
While you picked parts of arguments to give your answer, you also failed to answer simple questions such as
"If this ad breaks Indian laws, has any one challenged it? If not, why not?".
You did not or could not answer this question. But you went on to argue my argument is condoning an illegal activity? How do you know? You do not know the law the ad is breaking. No challenged it in a court.
if the ads did not break Indian law and follow Saudi requirements, I do not know if there is a legal problem to discuss.
Secularism:
Saudi's , as you would agree, do not endorse secularism. You and I or even the mighty America cannot impose our good intentioned idea of secularism on Saudis.
Inducements and religious conversion:
here is where I am a little miffed. People who complain about inducements and religious conversions have to put in a little effort. I have not seen any credible book or report that collected information in Kerala or anywhere in India about reliious conversion based on Saudi job inducements. Till such data is collected, complaints are useless.
In US , most think tanks back up their arguments with experts, reports, books, newpaper articles, and organized campaign to spread their specific ideas. In India, criticism is limited to complaints with no data to back up and effort to create the background information. There is a saying "We believe in god. Every one else bring data"
Raw,
I did not realize that you set out on the great task of proving the obvious.
I do not know your goal is to prove that India is not a secular country and Indian govt is not secular. This old news but let me repeat. India has never been a secular nation and it will never be a secular nation at time soon.
Just so that I could complete my news cast, US, UK, Germnay, Australia and France are secular either. They are very tolerant of other views but they are not secular.
For your reading pleasure, let me also add that all Indian political parties are opportunistic and use secularism as a Gandola to switch over to other side for opportunistic reasons (ex: SP's switch from opposition to supporting sworn enemy congress party).
None of those countries have the remotest pretensions of being secular. If anything, they are those extremely intolerant societies that many chaddis would like to turn India into.
While you are at it, why don't you take a look at matrimonial ads in Indian newspapers? In addition to the religion, they even specify the caste, sub-caste, gotra, color of skin and profession. What do you think that says about Indian society?

Rawemotions and Sylvan talk about Saudi why turn deaf and blind to what is happening in your own country?We ,have the tendency to hide our heads under the sand where our country is concerned but blame others for doing something which may not be so bad as to what is happening in our own country.
All of you remember when you point a finger at others ,one is pointing towards you.
You are blaming them for not recruiting non muslims but what killing muslims and specially shameful acts of violence against muslim women,killing innocent unborn babes in their mother's wombs ? What was their fault ,they were not Hindus.
Dont throw stones while sitting in a glass house.Have you forgotten the blood shed and mayhem in Gujarat?
>> Please read the post carefully. I am not blaming them for recruiting only muslims or for not recruiting non muslims.
>>I state that their advertisements indicating that they will only accept muslims is not compatible with secular
>>principles of Indian constitution.They can issue a general advertisement, through an agency & screen only
>>muslim resumes and hire them. We do not care. However a public advertisement in Indian newspapers
>>that discriminates against Hindus is not acceptable and contravenes secularism.
Looks like you have been taken in by the Mullah rhetoric.
If what you say is true then would you also agree that the Muslim kings from Ghori and Ghazni till the present day Mogul desendents ruling Pakisatan (that is what they claim) targetted hindus, raped Hindu women, forecebly converted millions of hindus, destroyed 1000s of temples and building mosques and masjids on top them ?
If Harijans and OBCs are given reservation today for their neglect in the past, shouldn't the Hindus be given ALL the seats and opportunities bcz they were the persecuted ones over the last 1000 years - that too when the muslims got their own country and scores of arab countries are there to give them asylum, citizenship, jobs, and MORAL support ?
*I am foreseeing where this thread is headed by my past "observations" on the patterns of such threads....
I think you got too emotional and mixed up many things..
Rawemotions and Sylvan talk about Saudi why turn deaf and blind to what is happening in your own country?We ,have the tendency to hide our heads under the sand where our country is concerned but blame others for doing something which may not be so bad as to what is happening in our own country.
All of you remember when you point a finger at others ,one is pointing towards you.
You are blaming them for not recruiting non muslims but what killing muslims and specially shameful acts of violence against muslim women,killing innocent unborn babes in their mother's wombs ? What was their fault ,they were not Hindus.
Dont throw stones while sitting in a glass house.Have you forgotten the blood shed and mayhem in Gujarat?
I never heard that Indian government made it a state policy to kill Muslims and perfom shameful acts on Muslim women, like in the case of Saudi government banning non-Muslims fromentering a couple of their holy cities / discriminating in favor of Muslims in jobs.
If you read the statistics on Gujarat riots tabled in the parliament by the "secular" government, around 850 Muslims and 250 Hindus died. It is a riot like the thousands of riots that took place / taking place / will take place in India. I think you are under estimating the power of Muslims of India to get back. Infact they are the ones who roasted Hindu women and children in the first place. Yeah yeah I know that Laloo submitted a report saying that those folks committed Sati / self immolation just before the Bihar elections. If you believe that, I have a bridge to sell. let me know..