When one goes only by the suicide note, there can't be any objective definition of "mental torture". What if someone commits suicide saying her spouse tortured her by wearing badly mismatched clothes all the time - is that sufficient grounds to prosecute the spouse? As per the current judgement, the answer is yes because we don't know how much of mental agony the wife suffered from her husband's bad dress-sense, and have only her word to go by.
Ok - I can't think of any, so you tell me what possible evidence can there be in a case of mental harassment by a husband on a wife. Since you are clearly very knowledgeable on what the judge based his decision on, please enlighten the rest of us as well so we don't labor under the belief that the judge was being silly.
The original point raised by this ruling is what constitutes mental torture. So the hypothetical scenario I raise is very germane to the case. If you can't see the link, stop taxing that poor lonesome grey cell of yours and stick to what you are most comfortable with i.e. baiting mullahs.

2 years is too little... I am sure she was not criticized just by the husband - but also probably by the in-laws... But, I am even surprised that this came to court - bcz this involves MINORITIES. The Mullahs would have hushed it up had she survived.
She was sensitive too much I think that is why she did not took revenge against him and continue on to her suicide...
Poor think I can imagine her pain; I heard once a similar case but this time the man received the penalty of the state which is to be shoot in the head against a concrete wall…
we cannot forget our animal instincts,,it is just to uncivilized to forget...that we are ultimately mere animals...