Jayalalitha makes a valid argument on Rama Setu

started by sara Boji 1 month ago
Beware. This is in Tamil.

Reply



Flat Nested

Replies


  Kayal Vizhi posted Re:Jayalalitha makes a valid argument on Rama Setu on 1 month ago
There is very little religious opposition in Tamilnadu. (JJ's is political). Why should we care about Hindian opposition? (Is there any opposition in Bengal, AP, Kerala, ...? No. Only in Hindi lands.

  Kayal Vizhi posted Re:Jayalalitha makes a valid argument on Rama Setu on 1 month ago
Dr. Thanjai Nalankill correctly asked, "This is Tamil soil". Why do we need the permission oh Hindian politicians to build whatever we want?

I agree with with him. If yopu disagree, say why.
  Uppili posted Re:Jayalalitha makes a valid argument on Rama Setu on 1 month ago
If you are a true Tamil patriot then you should have reworded your question thus:

"This is Tamil soil". Why do we need to GIVE permission FOR Hindian politicians to build whatever THEY want?

It only shows that you, Tanji Boy, and Pazha NaRImaran are all hindu hating commies of Pirabhakaran type.
  -sandilya. posted Re:Jayalalitha makes a valid argument on Rama Setu on 1 month ago
What did Jaya say?  Thanks.
  Uppili posted Re:Jayalalitha makes a valid argument on Rama Setu on 1 month ago
Who knows... KV only practices Tribunism...WHATEVER is the issue it will narrow down to Hindian and tamail independence.



  carvaka posted Re:Jayalalitha makes a valid argument on Rama Setu on 1 month ago
> If yopu disagree, say why.

why
  Kayal Vizhi posted Re:Jayalalitha makes a valid argument on Rama Setu on 1 month ago
I want ONLY serious replies for my posts.
  carvaka posted Re:Jayalalitha makes a valid argument on Rama Setu on 1 month ago
OK, I will seriously reply to your post now:

why.




  carvaka posted Re:Jayalalitha makes a valid argument on Rama Setu on 1 month ago
Based on her facial expression and the way her finger is pointed, I think she makes total sense.
  Kris posted Re:Jayalalitha makes a valid argument on Rama Setu on 1 month ago
To the extent I scanned thru it, the point being made is:

"why the differential treatment of Hindus i.e the government ignoring  their sensibilities?  The  government's treatment of the Hazratbal mosque- related riots  and the banning of 'Da Vinci Code' was the opposite, wherein it bent over backward"

Seems logical, altho'  the skeptic in me wonders if  there is a political angle.

P.S. As in all cases (French Canada, Basque movement, water rights in CA, you name it--), there is a Hindian angle that  youknowho deduces, which I am sure I am missing.
  Uppili posted Re:Jayalalitha makes a valid argument on Rama Setu on 1 month ago
JJ is more of a non-dravidian at heart and her political angle takes over when she moves to the center to get muslim votes.

But, the muslims almost have given up on her since her pro-hindu actions during her last term.  Muslim voters expect unequivocal and constant assurance of support to them and expression of secularism in EXACT words election or no election. MK and the DMK  enact that dram almost on a permanent basis, and have a lock on the Muslim voters.

Wait for MK to leave the scene for the next political turmoil in TN. After that JJ's departure from the scene in another 5 to 10 years. She is 61 and Indian women from her period are not healthy beyond 65 yrs - what with her obesity and other health problems.

Expect a Karnataka-like situation in TN starting 2010/2012 till 2020.




© 1998-2008 Copyright Sulekha.com Connecting Indians Worldwide, All Rights Reserved.

Embed Videos

TipTip: To embed video from YouTube or others, copy the embed URL given and click insert button.

Title:             

Embed script:

Insert