Indo US Deal is bad for communal harmony according to some notables in rediff
started by rawemotions 3 mnths agowww.rediff.com/news/2008/jun/30inter.htm
In the comments section of the article, one Yakub makes a statement. He says
So he says anything that anger muslims, even if completely unconnected (in this case the foreign policy decision by congress) is enough for muslims to attack Hindus and disrupts "communal Harmonu".
What a religion and what kind of people are these people ? Total Barbarism.
In the same article he makes other comments, where he states unambiguously that
"he will not let the deal pass through".
INDO-US Nuclear Deal IS BAD
by YAKUB on Jul 02, 2008 09:10 PM Permalink | Hide replies
WHY DO YOU WANT TO ANGER MUSLIMS AND DISRUPT COMMUNAL HARMONY FOR THE SAKE OF A SIMPLE DEAL?????????
LIVE AND LET LIVE
In the comments section of the article, one Yakub makes a statement. He says
So he says anything that anger muslims, even if completely unconnected (in this case the foreign policy decision by congress) is enough for muslims to attack Hindus and disrupts "communal Harmonu".
What a religion and what kind of people are these people ? Total Barbarism.
In the same article he makes other comments, where he states unambiguously that
"he will not let the deal pass through".
by YAKUB on Jul 02, 2008 09:10 PM Permalink | Hide replies
WHY DO YOU WANT TO ANGER MUSLIMS AND DISRUPT COMMUNAL HARMONY FOR THE SAKE OF A SIMPLE DEAL?????????
LIVE AND LET LIVE
|
|
u.s. policy is nt against indian muslims by Pradip Parekh on Jul 03, 2008 01:29 AM Permalink | Hide replies this man siddiki quite clearly is pan-islamist, forming his policy from pan-islamism. pan-islamism is definitely against india's interests. the man needs to be shunned by tje muslims who are not pan-islamists. of course, the gandhi-party (mistakenly known as congress) will embrace him precisely for the same reason he should be opposed. Forward | Report abuse  |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||